The web's reading platform.

Step Up & Be Heard: Readability Ideas

When we launched Readability a few weeks ago, we left a whole host of ideas and features on the drawing board. The ideas kept on coming, but we also wanted to go live sooner than later. Now that Readability has launched, we’re excited to pick up those ideas and run with them.

But great ideas don’t only come from us. Since we launched, we’ve been flooded with great ideas from users via email, Twitter, and other channels. Every time a good idea landed in our laps, we’d be excited and then anxious about losing it amidst all the noise…until now.

Introducing Readability Ideas. It’s a place where the Readability community – both readers and publishers – and the Readability team share, talk about and bring ideas to reality. You can log in with your Facebook or Readability account right into Readability Ideas.

We couldn’t be more excited about where we take Readability from here. We look forward to hearing your feedback on how we can make Readability the best reading platform on the web.

An Open Letter to Apple

Dear Apple:

It’s your friends from Readability. Remember us? You put our technology into your Safari browser last year. We’re writing this open letter because – well – we’re a little upset right now.

Last Friday, you notified us that our Readability iOS application was rejected. In explaining the rejection, you pointed us to 11.2 in the App Store Review Guidelines:

11.2     Apps utilizing a system other than the In App Purchase API (IAP) to purchase content, functionality, or services in an app will be rejected.

We’re obviously disappointed by this decision, and surprised by the broad language. By including “functionality, or services,” it’s clear that you intend to pursue any subscription-based apps, not merely those of services serving up content. Readability’s model is unique in that 70% of our service fees go directly to writers and publishers. If we implemented In App purchasing, your 30% cut drastically undermines a key premise of how Readability works.

Before we cool down and come to our senses, we might as well share how we’re feeling right now: we believe that your new policy smacks of greed. Subscription apps like ours represent a tiny sliver of app sales that represent a tiny sliver of your revenue. You’ve achieved much of your success in hardware sales by cultivating an incredibly impressive app ecosystem. Every iPad or iPhone TV ad puts the apps developed by companies like ours front and center. It was a healthy and mutually beneficial dynamic: apps like ours get exposure and you get to show the world how these apps make your hardware shine. That’s why we’re a bit baffled here.

To be clear, we believe you have every right to push forward such a policy. In our view, it’s your hardware and your channel and you can put forth any policy you like. But to impose this course on any web service or web application that delivers any value outside of iOS will only discourage smaller ventures like ours to invest in iOS apps for our services. As far as Readability is concerned, our response is fairly straight-forward: go the other way… towards the web.

Since we re-launched, we’ve already seen a significant amount of usage across a wide range of browsers, operating systems and devices via the Readability web interface – for both mobile and desktop. Looking ahead, we plan to redouble our efforts to deliver the best possible reading app using the latest best-of-breed web technology.

The new Readability is fueled by the free-form nature of the web. Just as content pumps through the web’s piping, apps like ours thrive as nodes on the web – unencumbered by levies or barriers imposed by others. As we said months ago: “for us, the web is the right bet.”

Still, we’re always looking to give readers the best possible reading experience and a native iOS client would help us do that. We hope you’ll change your mind. If you do, we’d be happy to resubmit the Readability iOS app.

Regards,

The Readability Team

P.S. We’d be glad to deliver Readability for iOS – with in-app purchasing – if you’d carve out 70% from your 30% fee and share it with writers and publishers, just as we do.

Enjoy Reading, Support the Grave Accent

As the Readability launch was drawing near, there was still an important unanswered question for the Readability team: what should the shortcut keys for the browser add-ons be? We wanted something that would feel natural to readers. It needed to be quick and easy to use. We would have none of that finger-twisting key combination nonsense.

And so we took a walk up and down the keyboard. Just about every key combination felt awkward or was already reserved for other applications or functions. The function keys were a cop out, so we avoided those. After a few laps, it was just sitting there staring at us.

It is arguably the most neglected key on the U.S. English keyboard. Programmers call it the “backtick” or “backquote” key. The more official name is downright morbid, the grave accent:

The grave accent key is comfortably sandwiched between the Tab and Esc keys. It literally sits on the edge of the keyboard, just waiting to be pressed (for reading now) or shift+pressed (for reading later). It wasn’t just perfect. It was addictive. It felt good to not only deliver something incredibly handy and useful but to also bring a modicum of much-deserved respect and recognition to the grave accent key.

A humble note to non-U.S. keyboard users: we are aware that the grave accent does not grace many non-U.S. English keyboards. In a future update to the browser add-ons, we plan to provide the ability to select your own shortcut key for Readability’s functions.

A Literary Beer Run

Today we kick off an occasional series of guest commentaries by Readability friends and neighbors. We believe the new Readability, alongside efforts elsewhere aimed at innovating the reading experience, is part of a broader conversation: the possibilities of fresh thinking around digital content, publishing, and—especially—the future of reading. They are some of the brightest folks we know: help us all take the conversation further.

On Readability

The last thing any industry wants to get compared to is the music business, but I’m going to start there anyway. If I were to describe the trajectory of music consumption over the last twenty years in a single word, it would not be “free,” but rather “more.”

When I was 11, I enrolled in the Columbia House music scheme, and found myself in debt to my parents for the first of many times. When I was 14, I bought Smashing Pumpkins and Nirvana bootlegs with shady Inkjet-printed sleeves and incorrect tracklistings ($35 for a copy of ‘In Uterarities’.) Later, I got a Minidisc player—the less said about that, the better. I ripped, burned, downloaded, misplaced CD binders, burned again, torched hard drives, bought new ones, organized libraries, made mixes. I loved, lost, and loved again.

Now I pay $10 per month to Rdio.com for access to unlimited streaming music online and on my iPhone. They don’t have everything (no Drag City?) so I’m keeping my MP3s, but it’s pretty damn comprehensive. It’s been a long, bumpy road from blowing my allowance money to that recurring $10/mo. charge on my credit card, and I’m excited by Readability precisely because it has the potential to fast-forward us straight to a system that readers might actually have designed themselves. A system in which the transaction occurs silently in the background, the presentation is both attractive and flexible, and the writing is the only thing that matters. More reading—less commerce.

beers

The Phantom Tollbooth

When my friend Max and I started Longform.org last year, we wanted it to be a music blog for non-fiction. Like a great song, a great story should be irrepressible; not the glossy pages of the magazine it was printed in, nor the heavily designed webpage where it comes to rest—but the piece itself. David Foster Wallace’s reporting from the McCain campaign bus? Rolling Stone had it on their site, then tucked behind a paywall without explanation or warning. Just killed the original URL. That URL was, of course, linked to in hundreds of eulogies and housed, to boot, one of the greatest pieces of political journalism in American history. From what I’ve read, Foster-Wallace was a reluctant Internet user, but that didn’t limit his eerie prescience on the topic circa 1996:

Very soon there’s gonna be an economic niche opening up for gatekeepers [.…] Not just of interest but of quality. And then things get real interesting. And we will beg for those things to be there. Because otherwise we’re gonna spend 95 percent of our time body-surfing through shit[.]

In the course of running Longform.org, I’ve repeatedly been asked: “So it’s just a bunch of articles you think are good?” Short answer: yes. Digital reading is in its infancy, and it’s exciting being one of a handful of people curating it at this stage. But I won’t be sad if waves of curator-bloggers erase our little niche. They, no doubt, will unearth far more treasures from the bowels of non-fiction history, and I will salute them for it.

Fifteen years later, our need for a Foster-Wallace-ian gatekeeper remains desperate, but the role has broadened dramatically.

Sure, curators are gatekeepers, but a decade of blogging, tweeting, facebooking, etc. has simplified their task. Our most dire need today is for a gatekeeper that can pull double-duty as a toll-collector, a seemingly simple task that has fractured the entire industry of newspaper and magazine publishing, perhaps irreparably. I won’t guess as to whether Readability’s gate will fail or succeed, but I sincerely believe they’re building it in the right way, and I like it a whole lot better than any of the other gates that have been hastily erected in my path.

It’s certainly more beautiful.

beers

Literary Beer Run

Never before has so much worthwhile writing been instantly available to so many eager readers.

We, as readers and writers, are at a a godamn incredible best-party-you’ve-ever-been-to party. Everyone you know is at this party. Everyone you’ve ever wanted to run into is at this party. It’s a party you wish would never end.

But the party, tragically, is running out of booze.

Here’s what happens next: a few people start complaining, which kind of ruins the vibe, and the crowds starts to trickle out, pretty soon the whole thing is over. So what are we going to do? Realistically, it’s not like all these people are going to tromp down to the store one by one and stock up.

What we need is some guy willing to say “everyone gimme five bucks and I’ll get lots of beer and it’ll all work out for everyone.” That guy is Readability. I’m gonna give that guy five bucks, and I hope you do too. And then, when he comes back, we can all get drunk. On reading!

An Embeddable Button for Reading

Before Readability came around, the minute I decided I wanted to settle into reading a page on the web, I would fish around for the Print button. It wasn’t an ideal solution, but it did present a slightly better reading view than the original page. It still usually required some additional messing around to increase the text size and such. It was far from ideal.

Readability, of course, changed all that. Still, the tool has always been a reader add-on – until now. With the new Readability, we’ve introduced an embeddable button that can be added to any web article  or blog post. When a visitor is viewing one of your pages, with just one click they’ll get a clean, comfortable and customizable reading view:

It’s incredibly simple to install. Just drop the code snippet in the appropriate place in your blog or CMS templates and you’re good to go. It’s available for anyone to use, no sign-up or registration required.

If you’ve dropped the Readability button on your web site or blog, be sure to let us know. We always enjoy seeing that little red couch in the wild.

The New Readability

Months ago on the Arc90 blog, we talked about why we built Readability. In that post. we shared some insights into some of the ideas that guided our thinking as we moved the platform forward.

Since then, it’s been an interesting time for reading on the web and publishing in general. We’ve seen important conversations bubble up that not only address the reading experience but also the quality and nature of web content itself. All the while, publishers are experimenting with new ways to extract value.

Enjoy Reading

Today, Readability graduates from basic web reading tool to a full-blown reading platform.

We’re introducing a whole slew of new features to make reading on the web even better. Readability now works on mobile phones and tablets and we now provide the ability to save a web article for reading later. You can even share your reading list so that others can follow what you’re reading.

We’ve put a lot of work into the existing free add-on as well. You can change your appearance settings at any time (not just on install) and share a Readability-enhanced link via Facebook, Twitter and email.

Support Writing

Beyond reading features, we wanted to leverage the platform to support the writers and publishers people enjoy on the web today. In other words, we wanted to tie a mechanism that supports publishers to the act of reading. It’s easier done than said. As we embarked on this new path, a voice rang from across the Atlantic that beautifully echoed our motivation and sentiment.

John Lanchester in the London Review of Books:

I feel equally certain in saying that what the print media need[…]is a new payment mechanism for online reading, which lets you read anything you like, wherever it is published, and then charges you on an aggregated basis, either monthly or yearly or whatever[…]

I also want to feel free to read anything else which catches my eye, whenever I feel like it – I just don’t want to have to think about paying every time I click on the article to read it. I want a monthly or yearly charge, taken off my credit card without my having to think about it.

We’ve never met John but we think his plea is dead-on. That’s exactly where we’re taking Readability—

We’re turning Readability into a monthly subscription service with a unique twist: the great majority of your fees (70%) will go directly to the writers and publishers you enjoy. We’re tethering a small, passive transaction to the reading decisions you make through the platform. You can even publicly share the top domains you’re enjoying through Readability. It’s a new type of badge: “I support these writers & publishers.”

The minimum subscription fee for Readability is $5.00 a month. If you can afford to pay more, we encourage you to do so. The more you pay, the more you’re supporting publishing on the web.

And “on the web” is what Readability is all about. It’s the unencumbered web without speed bumps or toll booths to slow you down. For writers and publishers, there is no approval process, no gatekeepers and no hardware dependencies. It’s the web with a quality reading experience bolted on.

We’re even providing publishers and developers with a suite of tools to enhance the reading experience for their readers.

We recognize that on the web, everyone is a publisher. We’ve even created a handy little embed button that brings the Readability experience right to your readers.

A Match Made in Reading Heaven

Part of the original inspiration for Readability is the exceptional iOS reading application Instapaper. Today, we couldn’t be more excited to announce a our partnership with Instapaper. Subscribers of Readability that own iPhones or iPads can download Readability for iOS, powered by Instapaper.

As of this writing, the app hasn’t been approved on iTunes, but look out for it in the coming days. We’ve got other big announcements surrounding the Instapaper-Readability partnership in the near future. Stay tuned.

Quality Content is Expensive

The core motivator behind the new Readability is pretty straight-forward: good, quality content is worth paying for and we shouldn’t have to rely on any particular platform or device to do so. Readability represents an ambitious attempt to reconcile the freedom and speed of the web with the need to pay for content that is worth paying for.

We couldn’t be more excited about the new Readability. We’ve got so much more to announce in the coming days and weeks. You can stay in the loop by following @readability on Twitter or checking back here on the Readability blog.

Happy reading!